The Madness I Lived, the Meaning I Made: A Cohesive Narrative For an Extreme Life

Creating a cohesive narrative of one’s life is one of the most powerful ways to make sense of what we’ve been through. It allows us to see patterns, understand our survival strategies, and reclaim a sense of agency in a world that often felt chaotic or unsafe. It can be especially challenging when the childhood you need to integrate is fragmented or partially lost. Memories are patchy, experiences feel disconnected, and the pieces of yourself that should fit together can feel like they belong to someone else entirely. Building a narrative in the face of that challenge is hard work, but it’s also a lifeline: a way to gather the scattered parts of yourself, honor your survival, and finally see the meaning you’ve made from a life that was anything but easy. The following is my cohesive narrative:

I came into this world in a neurophysiological storm. My early environments were not the kind where a child learns they’re safe, or wanted, or worthy just because they exist. They were largely places in which safety was conditional and could vanish any moment. Connection was unlikely, and too many times, the people I needed most were the ones I had to protect myself from, because nobody else would. That was my normal.

Even as a kid, my nervous system never got to rest. Every interaction was a calculation of how to avoid someone else’s temper, disappear in plain sight, and keep my body and mind intact enough to get through the next hour or even a minute of severe abuse. I learned that survival meant I had to pay close attention, read people down to the microexpression, and store the information. I also learned not to expect rescue. Because nobody even wanted to know about it.

And yet, I was never the kind to fold. I pushed back. Even as a child, I stood up to people much bigger and more dangerous than me. Sometimes the only thing worse than the risk of retaliation is the cost of staying silent. I learned early that there are moments where you choose: be broken down, or stand your ground. I stood my ground even when it meant I paid for it later.

Adulthood didn’t bring relief; it just raised the stakes. I entered medical, legal, and institutional systems that claimed to exist for protection and care, only to find they ran on the same rules I grew up with: protect the powerful, discredit the harmed, and keep the machine running. When I was harmed in a way that shattered my body and altered my entire life, the worst injury came in the years of neglect, dismissal, and outright obstruction from the people whose job was to help me recover.

For years, I begged for the care I needed. I wasn’t asking for miracles, just for people to do their jobs without hurting me more. Every delay, every missed opportunity for treatment, every arrogant refusal to listen carved deeper into my health. That’s how I ended up with multiple chronic conditions that are largely iatrogenic. That’s how my world became smaller, my pain sharper, and my survival far harder.

And still, I’ve kept building circles of safe people, moments of connection, and art that pulls the trauma out of my body and into the world where it can be seen. I’ve learned how to track what my system needs and to fight like hell to get it. I’ve learned that homeostasis isn’t just a biological concept. It is also the ground for joy, creativity, and love. I’ve learned that it’s not enough to survive; you have to keep your humanity intact, even when you’re frequently dehumanized.

Somewhere along the way, I came to understand what Arthur Miller meant in “After the Fall” about kissing one’s life and taking it into one’s arms. It doesn’t mean I approve of or even accept what happened, but claiming it as mine, all of it, without pretending or cutting pieces away. And even as I hold it, I know I’m not doing this alone. There is hope for me outside myself. It’s in the humanity of the people around me, especially as I help create the conditions for that humanity to emerge more freely. Every time someone meets me with care, listens without defense, or stands beside me in this fight, that hope becomes real.

Now, the fight for justice is the fight of my life. It will not fix what happened, but it’s the one chance I have to stop them from doing it to someone else. It’s the culmination of every survival adaptation I’ve ever made: reading the terrain, holding the line, refusing to disappear. I know powerful forces don’t want this story told. But I’ve lived my entire life in environments that tried to silence me, and I’m still here, still speaking.

I am who I am because of every environment I was given, and because I refused to let them define the limits of what I could do. I’ve carried harm that never should have been, and I’ve carried it with my head up. The same patterns that once kept me alive in danger now fuel the work I do to build safety for myself, others, and the communities I touch.

That’s my story, my cohesive narrative, how I make sense of my life. It’s not tidy, it’s not over, and it’s not one I would wish on anyone. But it’s mine. And as long as I have breath, I will use it to make sure the systems that failed me can’t pretend they didn’t know.

Posted in PTSD | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

When Healthcare Feels Dangerous: How Practitioners Shape Our Capacity to Heal

When I tell a practitioner that I’m not doing well, and they dismiss or minimize what I say–what I share of my lived experience–it makes everything worse. It increases my sense of unsafety. It pushes me even further onto Red Alert. When you’re in survival mode, you can’t focus on the things that make life worth living, the things that spark delight, joy, and pleasure. That’s a luxury you simply can’t afford.

The vast majority of the many healthcare practitioners I’ve met have no clue how to attune or connect. They don’t understand that compassionate witnessing, empathy, and recognition of strengths actively support the nervous system’s ability to function properly and maintain balance. They don’t grasp that their own state–how safe, grounded, and embodied they are–has a greater effect on our nervous systems than the influence of most other people in our lives. Their position gives them a sacred privilege, a greatly enhanced capacity to support or undermine someone else’s well-being.

The effect does not come from mere good intentions. It emerges from their authenticity, embodiment, and sense of safety in themselves and in the environment. But most of them are working in unsafe conditions: rushed, pressured, and full of cues that signal threat. Yet, we are expected to turn to these people, who themselves feel unsafe, for reassurance that we are safe. That’s insane.

From a neurobiological perspective, when someone in a caregiving role fails to provide a safe, attuned presence, it triggers the body’s survival systems. Energy goes to vigilance, hyperarousal, and self-protection, leaving almost nothing available for engagement, learning, joy, or connection. Safety is the foundation for all growth and repair, and when that foundation is missing, recovery and well-being are undermined at their core.

It is critical that healthcare practitioners understand the real, physiological impact of being seen, or not seen, by someone in a position of power and trust. Until healthcare acknowledges and addresses this dynamic, too many people, including healthcare practitioners, will continue to suffer unnecessarily.

Posted in Healthcare | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

An Open Letter to ChristianaCare Patient and Family Relations

To Denise, Charlie, Kellie, Manasi, and Jennifer of ChristianaCare Patient and Family Relations:

Since ChristianaCare banned me from contacting any of its employees because I won’t stop talking about the gynecologist who performed medicalized Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) on me, I thought I would write an open letter to you.

You may not remember me, but I remember you. I remember the soft voices, the courteous language, the practiced expressions. I remember the calm professionalism and even the artificial warmth that cloaked the quiet violence of your role.

Because that’s what it was, violence served up as caring. I came to you carrying harm: deep, life-altering harm caused by someone in your institution. I came seeking recognition, repair, and basic human dignity, based on the hospital’s declaration that

“Patient relations specialists can:

  •  Serve as your advocate.
  •  Encourage communication between you and your treatment team.
  •  Address your concerns.
  •  Assist in resolving conflicts or disagreements.
  •  Keep you informed of your rights and responsibilities.
  •  Ensure that your rights as well as the rights of all patients and staff are respected.”

What I encountered instead was a protracted performance intended to convince me to hush up and go away. That performance is a betrayal.

When a person harmed by an institution turns to that institution for help and meets containment rather than compassion, it compounds the harm. The nervous system doesn’t recognize bureaucratic gestures as safety. It recognizes attunement, responsiveness, and acknowledgment. And when it doesn’t get those, especially after trauma, it goes into shutdown, despair, and collapse.

You may think you have done your job. But your work reinforced the original wound: my experience didn’t matter, the pain your institution caused wasn’t real enough to change anything, and my suffering was an inconvenience to be managed. You became the mouthpiece of the system that harmed me.

This is institutional betrayal, and it doesn’t fade. It lands in the body. It disrupts the natural recovery process and locks the injury in place. It keeps people stuck in survival mode. It cuts off access to hope. And it often does more damage than the initial event.

What are we supposed to believe when the people whose title is “Patient and Family Relations” treat us as public relations problems? When we come to you injured and aggrieved, and are told to stop making trouble? That is not care. That is erasure.

While you might not recognize it, I want you to know what you are part of. You aren’t protecting people; you are protecting power. You protected the doctor who hurt me. You protect a hospital’s image. And in doing so, you help ensure that no one will be held accountable, no one will change, and others will likely be hurt again.

You closed the door on every person who might come after. And the worst part is, you closed something off in yourselves. There is no way to do your job without disconnecting from your humanity, learning to numb the part of you that wants to care, and slowly forgetting that real healing requires risk and that empathy is not a script, but a relationship.

If you went into this work because you wanted to help people, I’m writing to say that’s still possible. But not like this. Not by playing defense for a system that rewards silence and punishes truth. Not by gaslighting the people who are already bleeding and calling it “resolution.”

You still have a choice. And so do I.

The culture of disconnection from empathy, accountability, and the real impact on human lives protects predators and other abusers in power. Healing systems would require connection: to one another, to truth, and the shared responsibility of safety and integrity. Without that, the same patterns repeat, no matter who holds what title.

I’m choosing to speak, write, paint, and reclaim what your institution tried to strip from me: my voice, my value, and my story.

You can keep doing what the system asks of you. Or you can remember who you are and why you chose to sit in that seat across from people like me. The people who are hurting. The people who need you to be more than polite. The people who need you to be real.

Sincerely,

Shay Seaborne
Someone your institution deeply harmed and tried to silence

Posted in Activism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Doubly Cursed: The Cultural Victimization of Victims

My painting that depicts the culture simultaneously shaming, pinning, and burning a trauma survivor–who has been flattened, toasted, and bitten repeatedly–for being unable to stand up and produce.

I’ve experienced being dismissed, blamed, and pathologized for being harmed. Caregivers minimized my distress, family members judged me for expressing it, and acquaintances labeled me oversensitive when I tried to speak about what happened. The world treated me not as a human being responding to trauma, but as someone holding onto it unnecessarily, as though my nervous system’s attempts to survive were a moral failing.

This is how mainstream culture responds to victimhood. It doesn’t want to acknowledge the cruelty, neglect, or contempt that shapes human lives. Instead, it frames being harmed as a character flaw, as a “victim mentality,” or worse, as a manipulation. When people recognize that you were hurt, the default response is skepticism or contempt. This is a defense of hierarchy. If acknowledging suffering required accountability or change, it would disrupt the systems that keep some people in power and others undergoing harm.

The mental illness industry is deeply implicated. By turning distress into a diagnosis or a set of symptoms, it moves attention away from the relational and systemic sources of harm. It allows institutions and professionals to treat survival adaptations as problems, rather than signals of unmet needs. What was done to me, and how I responded, became something to manage or correct, not something to understand or honor.

When culture labels survivors as manipulative, self-centered, or “trapped in victimhood,” it dismisses real pain. The “victim mentality” is a tool for disregarding suffering, a way to keep the narrative comfortable for those who benefit from hierarchy and denial. Being harmed is already isolating; being doubly judged for that harm compounds the trauma.

From an Interpersonal Neurobiology (IPNB) perspective, these responses are predictable. Human beings respond to threat and betrayal in relational and systemic contexts. Denying or pathologizing those responses perpetuates suffering and blocks the possibility of real care, connection, and repair. Support recognizes that survivors are not the problem. The problem is the harm done and the culture that refuses to acknowledge it.

I know what it feels like to live under that shaming gaze. I know how isolating it is to have your suffering interpreted as a moral or personal failing. And I know that naming it, speaking it, and refusing to let the world dismiss it is the only path toward accountability and repair.

Posted in Abuse | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why I Won’t Call Pain “Banana”

There is a chronic pain community that discourages people from using the word “pain.” Instead, they encourage members to use the word “banana.” The idea is that replacing a threatening word with something neutral or even silly can help the nervous system relax, reduce fear, and support healing.

For me, this was an immediate turn-off. I understand what they’re trying to do, but it doesn’t land right. I’ve spent years fighting to have my reality named and recognized. Pain is pain. Calling it something else feels like erasure. It feels like the same cultural habit that has harmed me so deeply, minimizing suffering, softening it, or pretending it’s not there.

From an Interpersonal Neurobiology (IPNB) perspective, integration depends on coherence. Our brains and bodies need language that matches lived experience. If my body is screaming with pain but I’m told to call it “banana,” there’s a gap between what I feel and what I’m allowed to say. That mismatch creates more disconnection. Safety comes from being able to name the truth of experience and still be met with attunement, support, and respect.

This approach bothers me because it mirrors the dismissals I’ve already endured in medical settings, where symptoms were brushed off, renamed, or reframed instead of being taken seriously. I will not step into a community that repeats that same harm. I want to be in spaces where pain can be spoken plainly, where the words we use honor the reality of the body, and where naming what’s true is the foundation for connection.

That’s why I won’t join communities that rename pain. My body deserves coherence. My truth deserves language. My healing depends on it.

Posted in pain | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Real Zone of Growth is Not Outside the Comfort Zone But Inside the Window of Tolerance

A whiteboard at a local gym promotes the idea that “growth only happens outside the comfort zone,” which is popular in our “push through” culture. Stagnation can happen when there’s no challenge and no novelty. But if pushed too far, the nervous system moves into defense rather than learning.

Growth is most possible when a system has enough safety and stability to stretch without tipping into overwhelm. So, the real zone of growth is within the window of tolerance, where there’s both safety and just enough stress to activate curiosity and adaptation.

Growth doesn’t come from leaving comfort behind, but from expanding comfort through repeated experiences of safety in the presence of challenge.

“Sweet discomfort” describes that edge where the nervous system feels the stretch but still senses safety. It’s the space where new experiences can be integrated instead of being rejected as a threat. There’s tension, maybe unease, but it’s held inside a sense of connection and choice.

From an Interpersonal Neurobiology view, this is the zone where regulation and learning meet. The discomfort signals growth in progress, and the “sweet” part means the system trusts it can handle the moment. When we have enough relational support, that stretch becomes transformative instead of traumatic.

Posted in Neurobiology, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Survivors in the Lurch: How Doctors Disregard Their Role in Resolving Medical Trauma

Recently, I heard the same line I’ve been hearing for years. A prominent pain specialist told me that doctors don’t have the time to help me recover from medical PTSD. The conversation always drops straight into the same rut: “Are you seeing a therapist?” As if therapy is the only place where repair can happen. As if the medical world gets to wash its hands of the harm it caused and send me somewhere else to deal with the fallout.

I’ve graduated from therapy. It did what it needed to do. It helped me understand the terrain of what I’ve lived through and how my body learned to survive it. But therapy cannot repair what was done in white coats and exam rooms. It cannot stand in for the people who caused the injury. Therapy cannot rebuild a sense of safety around medicine. Only clinicians can, because the harm came from them. Yet they most often refuse to see that. They keep handing the responsibility back to me and the therapists I no longer need, as if the violence that happened in their domain is not theirs to address.

Doctors don’t want to be responsible for what doctors do. They want the authority without the accountability. They want the prestige without the relational duty that comes with it. When you bring them the truth that Medical PTSD is rooted in power, dismissal, coercion, and violation at the hands of people who were supposed to protect you, they slip sideways. They say they are not therapists, and they send you elsewhere. They pretend that acknowledgment and attunement are optional extras rather than the ground floor of repair.

What I need is simple. I need every doctor I encounter to say, “I’m sorry that happened to you. It was wrong. You deserved protection. I believe you. I want to help you recover.” I ask for a moment of attunement and a single drop of empathy. I need one sign that the hierarchy can bend toward humanity. But for most of them, that’s too much. They’re so fused to the culture of domination that even a brief acknowledgment feels threatening. They’d rather refer me out than face what their profession has done.

Pain specialists too often circle back to whether I have a therapist. As if the missing ingredient in my recovery is more therapy rather than attuned, accountable medical care. I still need doctors to do what doctors have refused to do. I need them to recognize the harm, stop repeating it, and stay present long enough that my system can recalibrate its expectations around medicine. I don’t expect to ever feel fully safe in this environment again. That’s the reality of what prolonged medical trauma does. But any increase in safety, any softening of the threat matters. It’s imperative for recovery.

The help I need costs them nothing. A brief moment of human connection. A willingness to face the truth. A break in the hierarchy long enough for trust to take root. But instead, they leave me in the lurch, pushing responsibility onto therapists and onto me, dodging what only they can provide. And in doing so, they deliver the standard treatment that keeps the wound open and call it care.

This refusal to engage at the human level means the burden of safety and repair falls squarely back on the survivor. I have been forced to carefully vet practitioners not just for their technical skill, but for their capacity for relational decency. I must also be an educator, patiently teaching the basics of trauma-informed care and Interpersonal Neurobiology (IPNB), which should be foundational to their training. Yet, in this demanding work, a new, small hope emerges: the empathetic relationship, when it takes root, is a two-way street. It offers the provider a chance to break free from the dehumanizing confines of the hierarchy, restoring their own sense of relational purpose, and thus benefiting both the practitioner and the patient.

Posted in Accountability, Healthcare | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

From Trauma to Truth: How I Became Anti-Psychiatry

I became anti-psychiatry because of what psychiatry did to me and what I saw it do to others. I walked in with severe Complex PTSD. They put me on Lexapro. The suicidal ideations started about 3 weeks after. When I told them what was happening, they brushed it off twice.  The third time, I wrote it in the patient portal, where they couldn’t ignore it. That landed me in psychiatric hospitalization for eight days and nights. This was a manufactured mental health crisis.

In the cuckoo’s nest, they stacked medications on me. None of it helped. All of it made things worse. They refused to believe me about my own lived experience in this body. They wouldn’t acknowledge that the SSRI caused the suicidal ideations. When I refused to keep taking Lexapro, the psychiatrist insisted I should stay on it longer. I pushed back, using my doctor’s words to validate my stance. She responded by putting me on another SSRI. That place was a warehouse of polypharmacy and misery. Everything ran on coercion, control, and billing codes. Not care.

When I got out, I threw the pills away. I refused their outpatient program because it was the same facility that had neglected and abused me, calling it treatment. When I filed complaints, the licensing board told me no one had done anything wrong. They said it was all standard treatment, so it was okay. That told me exactly what the standard is. They do this to everyone.

Since then, I’ve heard countless stories from other survivors. Tales of being dismissed, coerced, mislabeled, drugged, and trapped on medications that wrecked their lives. Stories of people fighting like hell to get off pills they never wanted in the first place. And then I saw the research showing the whole “chemical imbalance” story was never anything more than a marketing scheme. How are we supposed to trust an industry that sells lies at that scale and calls it science? Especially when the truth is revealed, and they still keep pushing the goddamn pills?

From an Interpersonal Neurobiology (IPNB) perspective, what they call “treatment” makes no sense. Human beings need connection, safety, attunement, and support for the nervous system to settle. We need cultures that reduce allostatic load, not increase it. But psychiatry pathologizes natural human responses to an abnormal, punishing culture. It responds to distress with drugs, restraints, locked doors, and diagnostic labels that follow people for life.

That’s why I want psychiatry shut down as fast as possible, without abandoning the people who are tangled up in it or relying on it because they were given no alternatives. People deserve actual support, not an industry built on domination, hierarchy, and the medicalization of suffering.

I became anti-psychiatry because I survived the abuse that the industry calls care. I want a world where suffering is met with presence, understanding, and genuine community, not coercion disguised as help.

Psychiatry isn’t just coercion. It’s control. It’s money. It’s not human. It’s not about helping people at all. It’s about maintaining the power structure, keeping the money flowing, and exploiting vulnerable individuals for profit. The suffering of human beings is the product, and the system is designed to extract it, normalize it, and profit from it. That’s why it has to end.

Posted in Psychiatry | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

When “I’ll Pray for You” is a Symptom of Disconnection

I reached out to my brothers when I was in a protracted and deep struggle. I asked for safe connection, acknowledgment, and support. I needed them to see me and recognize how repeated abuse from the disease management industry had nearly obliterated me.

But my youngest brother couldn’t meet me there. He said, “I’ll pray for you.” He was incapable of offering comfort or connection. His lack of empathy was an enormous red flag. It showed an inability or unwillingness to recognize and respect the experience and boundaries of others. Without empathy, a person can’t reliably respond to harm they cause, can manipulate or exploit, and is unlikely to repair relationships when they go wrong. It signals that connection, safety, and mutual respect aren’t priorities for them.

I was struggling for my life. I didn’t need abstract gestures or rituals. I needed attunement, presence, recognition, and tangible support. From an Interpersonal Neurobiology (IPNB) perspective, praying for someone doesn’t meet a flooded nervous system that is overwhelmed and desperate for safety. It doesn’t communicate that someone is standing with you, bearing witness to your suffering. It’s a symbolic gesture, like offering a cheap plastic Band-Aid in response to a broken leg. No thanks! I’m better off without.

To me, that moment was a clear signal of detachment. It was uncaring, rooted in disconnection. It was a relational message: my reality, suffering, and needs did not matter. His response was part of an attempt to otherize me and diminish me for failing to thrive after a lifetime of horrific abuse by “caregivers.” It wasn’t safe or healthy. It was indicative of an uncaring relationship.

If my brother had meant well, he would have offered something helpful, like “I see how much you’re suffering. I hope you find relief. I’m here for you.” That would have acknowledged my humanity and the legitimacy of my pain. Even better, since he has the resources, he could have offered genuine support, like a visit, financial help, practical assistance, or anything that actually responded to the reality of my struggle. He offered a platitude instead of engagement. Due to his own impediments and his taking up the role of the dogmatic replacement patriarch, a hollow, “I’ll pray for you,” was the best he could offer.

From an IPNB perspective, this is the kind of relational failure that keeps a nervous system in survival mode. Connection regulates us. Safety allows a system to settle. When someone responds with abstraction or disdain instead of presence, the system is left alone in overwhelm, left to manage the consequences of disconnection. My brother’s response was not a misstep, but a message. He made it clear that a relationship with him is not safe.

That is why I went no contact. I wish for family, but safety matters more. My nervous system, health, recovery, and sense of being human require relationships that are attuned, present, and responsive. Anything else is harm.

I share this to name what is real. Sometimes family fails in ways that can’t be negotiated, mediated, or worked around. Sometimes the only way to preserve your safety is to step away. Connection matters. Safety matters. Presence matters. So, I chose to disconnect.

If I were to pray for my brother, I would ask that he gain the healing and integration that allow him to show empathy to his sister when she’s experienced repeated and egregious harm, instead of trying to take advantage of her vulnerable state so smash her further into the ground. But I believe that is up to him. So, bye-bye, baby brother. Good luck!

Posted in Abuse | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Cost of “Positive Vibes Only”: How Denying Reality Shuts Down the Human System

The Cultural Demand to Stay Positive Harms Us
Every day we’re told to “think happy thoughts,” to “focus on the good,” to keep our “vibration high.” It’s the cultural chant of a society terrified of pain and truth, and addicted to denial. But we can’t “positive vibes only” our way out of a domination hierarchy that feeds on human suffering. We can’t meditate our way out of cruelty and contempt.

The Nervous System Doesn’t Buy It
Our nervous systems don’t care about slogans. They respond to cues of safety and cues of danger. And the cues of danger are everywhere: exploitation, injustice, abandonment, and greed paraded as success. Pretending it’s fine doesn’t make the threat go away. It just forces the body to swallow it whole.

When Mind and Body Tell Different Stories
From an Interpersonal Neurobiology lens, what happens is simple but devastating. When the truth of our environment contradicts the story we’re trying to tell ourselves, the system can’t settle. The body keeps scanning for what’s real, but the mind keeps insisting everything’s okay. That split creates internal chaos, an ongoing tug-of-war between perception and pretense. The result is disconnection from self, from others, from life.

Suppression Disguised as Regulation
We call that regulation in our culture–holding it together, staying positive–but it’s not regulation. It’s suppression. It’s survival. And it costs us our vitality. The person who learns to ignore their own alarm signals loses access to their own knowing. They stop noticing what feels wrong. They stop being moved by what matters.

The Price of Denial
When we override danger cues long enough, the system shuts down the parts of us that register meaning, empathy, and awe. We stop feeling fully alive. We’re no longer fully participating in the human experience. We’ve traded truth for comfort, authenticity for performance.

A Culture Built on Numbness
This isn’t individual failure. It’s a collective adaptation to a sick culture that punishes awareness and rewards numbness. The mainstream message is: don’t name the harm, just manage your attitude. But all that does is keep the harm in place. It teaches people to tolerate what should never have to be tolerated.

Congruence Heals
A healthy nervous system depends on congruence; what we feel, what we know, and what’s actually happening need to line up. When the culture demands we deny what’s happening, we can’t reach coherence. We stay fragmented, anxious, exhausted, half-alive.

Choosing Truth Over Performance
Seeing what’s wrong is not negativity, but sanity. It’s the body insisting on truth. And until we stop shaming that insistence, we’ll keep mistaking shutdown for peace and compliance for healing.

Being Fully Human
Being fully human means being able to face reality together. That’s the only path to genuine safety, to health, to a life that feels alive.

Posted in Neurobiology | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment